There appears to be agreement explicit or implicit, however, (There's always a "However" ) An argument could be made that the arbitration's arbitrary rules violated Federal Law and/or Due Process by imposing rules of law that were not foreseeable nor anticipated. I.e., the clause that states both LA substantive and LA procedural rules would be followed. That appears to be in conflict with the Diversity Rules. Just looking at the opposition.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.